Sympathetic Resonance Technology™

Participants wore pendants for one month while an electromagnetic stressor sat near the head, with resting EEG recorded before and after. The design was double-blind — neither the participants nor the researchers knew which pendant was active until the data were in and the code was broken.

Across the active-pendant sessions, EEG patterns held steady substantially more often than with the placebo. Reported as Part I of a two-part investigation, it is a controlled, blinded signal that SRT supports the steadiness of the body's electrical rhythms under everyday electromagnetic load.

Shealy CN, Smith TL, Thomlinson P, Tiller WA. Subtle Energies & Energy Medicine, 9(3): 231–245 (1998).

The study ran at a small specialized school in Scottsdale, Arizona, next to a power substation and with computers and fluorescent lighting in every room — steady, everyday electromagnetic exposure. 52 students aged 6 to 19 and 11 teachers took part over one month, with active units and placebo units swapped through the classrooms week by week.

Because the design was double-blind — neither students nor teachers knew which units were active in a given week — the behavior tallies the teachers kept couldn't be shaped by expectation. With the active units in place, total recorded incidents fell 38% and academic incidents fell 49%.

The researchers call the results preliminary, given the four-week run and modest group size, and planned a longer follow-up. It is an early, blinded signal that easing how a child responds to a high-EMF room can show up as steadier, more settled focus.

Findings reported in Rubik, B., Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 8(2): 823–856 (2002).

Researchers grew human connective-tissue cells (fibroblasts) and split them into four groups, crossing SRT conditioning with a chemical stressor (Mitomycin C, a standard agent in cell research), then counted how many cells survived.

Among the stressed cells, 11.1% were lost when they had been SRT-conditioned first, against 17.3% when they had not — about 36% fewer, and the difference held up statistically.

Cells in a dish can't hold beliefs or expectations, so a result like this speaks to whether the effect is real rather than perceived. This is an independent, statistically significant signal that SRT supports cellular resilience under stress.

Conducted by Professor Wilhelm Mosgoeller, M.D., at the Institute of Cancer Research, University of Vienna.

The protocol was built to remove bias from the start, including from the people running it. Researchers used an established stress model in which environmental stress pushes cells to shift into a transformation stage, and read the proportion that shifted objectively. To check the effect came from SRT and not the device's electronics, they ran a sham unit — same electronics, no SRT — alongside the active one, across three experiments each.

In the control environment, about 50% of the population reached the transformation stage; in the SRT environment, about 32% did — roughly a third fewer, holding steady across the repeated runs.

This study contends with the placebo question: an objective endpoint, a sham control, blinding built in, and reproduction across runs. Cells can't expect or believe anything — so a calmer, less-stressed response points to a real effect of the SRT environment.

Independent investigation conducted by Stuart Krassner, Ph.D., Department of Biology, University of California, Irvine.

In a blinded comparison, participants wore an active unit or a placebo while a high-resolution ECG tracked heart-rate variability — a window onto how the body's automatic regulation is working — across the waking day and the hours before sleep. (No unit was worn during sleep.) As a pilot, the sample was small.

The clearest result came in the four hours before sleep, where the active-unit group's heart-rate-variability balance improved significantly over the placebo group.

It is a genuine, statistically significant pilot signal that wearing SRT before sleep supports a more balanced daytime-into-evening response.

Independent European pilot study examining autonomic nervous system response. Institution and researcher not identified per source confidentiality.

Twenty competitive freedivers (9 men, 11 women) split into a Q-Link group and a control group, each mixing top-class and lower-qualification athletes. Both trained the same way for eight weeks while researchers measured underwater distance, dive time, and heart rate during and after the dive.

The gains showed up most in the lower-qualification divers: distance rose about 12% with Q-Link while falling about 6% in controls, and dive time rose about 20% against no change. Top-class divers, already near their ceiling, gained a smaller 3% against a decline in their controls.

It is a controlled study showing real performance gains, clearest where there was the most room to grow.

Conducted by Molchanova N.V. and Lukova O.V., Russian State University of Physical Education, Sport and Tourism.

Subjects were measured at 40 acupuncture meridian points with an electrodermal device that reads skin response on a 0–100 scale, where 50–55 counts as balanced. Three conditions were compared: baseline with no stressor, a common electrical-appliance stressor alone, and that stressor with Q-Link worn for under two minutes beforehand. Eighteen of the participants met the applied stressor.

The stressor pushed readings out of the balanced range. With Q-Link worn during it, more readings came back into balance than at baseline in 78% of those cases (14 of 18), and in 72% (13 of 18) the number of balanced readings was at least three times higher than with the stressor alone.

It is an early, small-sample signal — consistent in direction across most subjects — that wearing SRT helps the body hold its balance when an everyday electrical stressor gets in the way.

Dr. Tyteeka Reye, ND, DScF, Acacia Whole Health Clinic, Denver. Statistical analysis attributed to Professor Michael Kundi, Ph.D., University of Vienna, as reported in Rubik, B., Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 8(2): 823–856 (2002).

Twelve elite racehorses took part across two of Australia's leading thoroughbred stables. Eight wore the Q-Link Ally (predecessor to the Q-Link OASYS) with a Q-Link Horse Pendant; four served as controls, all under matched training stress, with blood read by live- and dry-blood analysis.

This was a Q-Link-supported study with an unblinded blood reading. All eight Q-Link horses improved on specific markers (fibrin and platelet profiles), while controls showed little or no change.

Because horses can't hold beliefs or expectations, an animal result speaks to the placebo question — further anchored by Krassner's blinded, objective work.

In testing conducted with Q-Link. Conducted at John Morish Stables and Bart Cummings Leilani Lodge Stables; blood analysis by Christopher Manton; research design by Allison Lowry.

Twenty-four participants took part in a single-blind crossover design, with resting EEG and evoked neural responses recorded under active phone alone versus active phone plus the Q-Link Ally.

The study's central finding is that wearing Q-Link returned brain wave activity toward its baseline pattern during mobile phone exposure — a measurable, statistically significant effect.

In testing conducted with Q-Link. Companion paper published in Clinical Neurophysiology.

Twenty patients were tested for muscle strength at baseline and during exposure to common EMF sources like computers. Those who tested weaker under EMF were retested wearing either an active Q-Link or a sham — each sealed in identical black bags and handled by a third party, so neither the examiner nor the subject knew which was which.

Of the 20, 17 (85%) showed a marked return of strength under EMF with the active Q-Link but not the sham; one responded to the sham only, and two to both.

It is a blinded, sham-controlled signal that Q-Link supports steadier strength under EMF — the body holding strong when the interference would otherwise get in the way.

In testing conducted with Q-Link. Conducted by Eric Peirotti, DC, Ch.D (Adel.).

Twelve patients already under applied-kinesiology care, each showing an acupuncture-meridian imbalance that the Q-Link cleared on testing, wore the Q-Link daily — removing it only during testing — for three to six months. Each patient's own prior history served as the baseline.

This was an open-label study under ongoing applied-kinesiology care. The imbalance cleared in all twelve while wearing Q-Link, and ten of the twelve stayed clear over three to six months. On symptoms, three improved markedly, six improved, three held steady, and none worsened — about a 75% rate of symptomatic improvement linked to the Q-Link.

It is an early, observational signal that Q-Link supports acupuncture-meridian balance and steadier day-to-day symptoms.

In testing conducted with Q-Link. Conducted by Robert M. Blaich, D.C.

Subjects were measured on the standardized forward-bend test — a recognized measure of spinal flexibility and range of motion — with and without the Q-Link, under matched conditions.

Of the 25, 21 (84%) reached measurably further with the Q-Link, by about 1.5 inches on average; four showed no change. When the Q-Link came off, of those 21, ten returned all the way to their starting point, six held the gain, and five came part-way back.

It is a simple, repeatable indicator that Q-Link supports everyday range of motion — the body moving the way it can when nothing's getting in the way.

In testing conducted with Q-Link. Conducted by Robert M. Blaich, D.C., with Dwight Shaneyfelt, RN, DC, DIBAK, and Rimon Issac, D.O.

At a PGA event, 73 golfers — professionals and active golfers — were tested once. Of those, 16 were tested twice for hand strength and 14 twice for cognitive flexibility, before and after a few hours wearing a Q-Link. MedSource, an independent evaluation company contracted by Q-Link, ran the testing.

Among those retested, hand strength rose about 5.9% on the left and 7.5% on the right; on the cognitive battery, attention improved in 71%, motor response in 79%, and reaction time in 64%, with fatigue easing across trials. Those percentages describe the small test/retest groups (14 to 16 people), not all 73.

This was a same-day field demonstration rather than a controlled trial — a real-world signal of steadier strength and sharper focus over a few hours of wear.

In testing conducted with Q-Link. Conducted by Ray J. Gagne, EET, CFE, NADEP, with MedSource LLC, an independent evaluation company.

Twenty competitive high-school cross-country runners (10 male, 10 female, ages 14 to 18) were tested for whole-body strength and cognitive flexibility on day one and again on day five, at the same time and in the same order. Within each gender, half wore a working Q-Link and half a non-working placebo — a real placebo-controlled design. MedSource, an independent evaluation company contracted by Q-Link, ran the testing.

The working-Q-Link group's whole-body strength rose about 6.0% (males) and 5.7% (females), against about 1.0% and 0.4% in the placebo group — roughly a five-point edge each. Cognitive-flexibility scores tracked positively with wearing a working Q-Link rather than a placebo.

In testing conducted with Q-Link. Conducted by Ray J. Gagne, EET, CFE, NADEP, with MedSource LLC, an independent evaluation company.

184 sixth-grade students (average age 12) across eight classes at a public middle school in Northeast Kansas took part; 91 completed all the repeated surveys and made up the analysis group. The classrooms carried everyday EMF from televisions, VCRs, and computers, with readings documented from under 1 mG to over 100 mG. Active Q-Link ClearWave devices (predecessor to the Q-Link Nimbus) and identical sham units were placed in the rooms double-blind — neither students, teachers, nor the researcher knew which was active.

What makes the study distinctive is that design: a double-blind classroom setup, a standardized self-report survey of how settled versus on-edge students felt, and documented real-world EMF in each room. In the active-device classrooms, students' in-the-moment calmness improved about 1.6 times as much as in the control classrooms. Their longer-term, general disposition didn't change.

It is a double-blind classroom signal, consistent in direction with the broader pattern of SRT and a calmer, more settled state.

Conducted by David A. Eichler, Ph.D., Holos University; presented to the manufacturer for review.